Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz
Also: LkSG, Lieferkettengesetz, Sorgfaltspflichtengesetz, Lieferketten-Sorgfaltspflichtengesetz, Gesetz über die unternehmerischen Sorgfaltspflichten in Lieferketten
AI-generated
The Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) requires companies above a certain size to systematically identify and address human rights and environmental risks across their entire supply chain.
Key facts
- The LkSG requires companies above a certain number of employees to systematically analyze and address human rights and environmental risks in the supply chain.
- Obligations include risk analysis, preventive and remedial measures, a grievance mechanism, and annual documentation and reporting to BAFA.
- Direct suppliers are subject to ongoing due diligence obligations; indirect suppliers are only subject to review when a specific cause arises.
- In logistics, the law also affects transport service providers, subcontractors, and warehouse partners, particularly with regard to working conditions and environmental standards.
- The LkSG is a statutory minimum framework — voluntary ESG programs may go beyond it, but overlap with many of the same implementation measures.
What is the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act?
The Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) is a German federal law that obligates companies to observe due diligence requirements with regard to human rights and environmental standards in their supply chain. It applies directly to companies headquartered or established in Germany that exceed a certain number of employees. In terms of content, it is aligned with international guiding principles such as the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Its aim is to ensure that companies take responsibility not only for their own conduct, but also for that of their suppliers and subcontractors.
How does the LkSG work in practice?
The law prescribes a multi-stage process. First, both event-driven and regular risk analyses must be conducted to identify human rights and environment-related risks within the company's own business area as well as among direct suppliers. Based on this analysis, preventive measures must be implemented — such as contractual arrangements, supplier codes of conduct, or training programs. If specific violations occur, remedial action must be initiated. In addition, an accessible grievance mechanism must be established through which internal and external whistleblowers can report misconduct. All measures must be documented and recorded annually in a report submitted to the Federal Office for Economic Affairs and Export Control (BAFA). Obligations regarding indirect suppliers apply only on an event-driven basis — that is, when the company becomes aware of specific risks.
In logistics, this means in concrete terms: transport service providers, warehouse partners, and subcontractors are coming under greater compliance scrutiny. Working conditions for drivers, safety standards in third-country warehouses, and environmental requirements for disposal service providers are typical areas of review. In procurement, the LkSG contributes to a greater formalization of supplier selection and qualification: questionnaires, audits, certificates, and contractual clauses are becoming fixed components of the procurement process.
What matters when implementing the LkSG?
A critical first step is defining the scope: which suppliers are considered direct, and which are indirect? This classification determines the extent of the due diligence obligations. A practical risk classification — for example, based on country, industry, and product risks — helps to deploy resources in a targeted manner without scrutinizing every supplier relationship with the same intensity.
It is also important to distinguish the topic from ESG: the LkSG is a legally binding minimum framework. Voluntary ESG programs may go beyond it, but overlap with many of the same implementation measures. Companies that already operate a sustainability management system can often leverage existing structures, but must review them against the specific statutory requirements. Whether and how digital tools for supplier evaluation or monitoring are used depends on the vendor and is not legally prescribed — what matters is the demonstrable outcome, not the tool.
Related terms
- 4PL - Fourth Party Logistics
4PL (Fourth Party Logistics) refers to a logistics model in which an external partner coordinates the entire supply chain and manages multiple 3PL providers and carriers without performing any physical transport or warehousing services itself.
- Ausschreibungsmanagement Logistik
Logistics tender management refers to the structured overall process by which companies solicit bids for logistics services or systems on the market, make offers comparable, and prepare a well-founded award decision.
- Beschaffungslogistik
Procurement logistics encompasses all logistical processes that manage the flow of materials from suppliers through to handover at the warehouse or production facility. It connects purchasing, transportation, and goods receipt into a seamless inbound process.
- CO₂-Bilanz Logistik
The CO₂ balance in logistics captures and quantifies all greenhouse gas emissions arising along the logistics process chain – from transport and warehousing to upstream and downstream activities.
- Compliance Definition
Compliance refers to adherence to legal regulations, regulatory requirements, internal policies, and contractual obligations.
- Cost-to-Serve
Cost-to-Serve refers to the total costs incurred to fully serve a specific customer, customer segment, or order. The metric consolidates all relevant cost components along the order fulfillment process and enables cause-based cost allocation.

